Evolution or Devolution?

Talk about just anything from politics to science, society, the typical thai girl, etc., or just gossip about. It doesn't need anything to do with Korat, Isaan or Thailand at all.
Benutzeravatar
Rudi (†2019)
Korat-Isaan-Reporter
Beiträge: 147
Registriert: Mi Nov 14, 2012 2:05 pm

Evolution or Devolution?

Ungelesener Beitragvon Rudi (†2019) » Di Jun 07, 2016 4:33 pm

There are different world views, on the one hand, the materialist and secondly the spiritualistic worldview. The Materialistic or the material means that it is assumed that there is only physically detectable matter. This also means that we are only physical beings. With the death of the body is all over. Also even feelings, emotions consciousness are all just material by-products of the brain. This is the real state of modern science, from which one thinks, so be it.
However, this is a claim that no one has seen that a reptile, a mammal or a reptile amphibian was. That's just an assumption that it was so done in the past, so a belief. And if you look critically, a not very reasonable faith.

In contrast, there are spiritual orientations, the rise of life a spiritual product is flat, and not a product of matter, but just the opposite, matter is the final stage of compression of energy that was ultimately shaped by the spirit of consciousness. Accordingly, it is not like in materialism in the beginning was the matter, nothing more than matter, but at the beginning always and ever the Spirit. The soul and the spirit incarnate here in this world and shape the matter by animate matter. So life is not generated from matter, but life has always been there and come to this earth through a devolution, namely highest, least compressed stages of the universe copy and produce these different planes of existence in the next lower compacted forms up to the so-called 7th level, to the level of the earth where the matter on compacted is. At the point of greatest compression, at the same time at a turning point.
So these are two completely different views that simply are not only irrelevant, but have very dramatic consequences, just man up as a material passing shadow or seen as mentally eternal being. These are worldviews that differ like night and day.

Even some of the most astonishing miracles in our nature clearly show that from a scientific point of view, is completely exclude based on random processes creation of life. This truth recognized by more than 60 years, the once atheistic author and philosopher Malcolm Muggeridge, who it like this put it: "I am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it is applied, as one of the biggest jokes in the history books the future could. Posterity will wonder how such a weak and dubious hypothesis could be so incredibly recklessly accepted. "
And so it is only logical to ask whether life is not but comes from a goal-oriented process of creation. Exactly this principle tells us the Bible. Because here the necessary from the perspective of computer science spiritual resource for all information (and thus also for the biological information) is mentioned on the first page:
"In the beginning God created."

Despite all critical voices of our ungodly time, there are always recognized scientists who admit the obvious and have the courage to speak out clearly in public against the evolutionary model. Among them was Michael Behe belongs. He is professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and accepted initially the scientific theory of evolution fully. Gradually, he began the evolution fundamentally into question.
Likewise, cannot explain what "life" because is actually a scientist. We can only designate characteristics of life, but the theory of evolution did not occur can the slightest explanation as living from dead matter.

Accordingly, there is to this area of reality also a law of nature that the microbiologist Louis Pasteur (1822 - 1895) recognized and has been confirmed repeatedly, "life can only come from life." This statement is not in full compliance with all experimentally determined data world in inanimate nature even today. The question which this case but inevitably arises is: So where did the first living creature?

The inconsistency shows the ambiguous condition in which the science is very good today. On one side of the universe is a huge technical effort monitored by an intelligent signal and on the other hand, the coded information is ignored in every single cell.

Zurück zu „Open Discussion and Cross Talk (serious & jest)“



Wer ist online?

Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 24 Gäste